Misconceptions on philosophy II


In my previous post, I tried to clarify some of the misconceptions on philosophy in general by defining philosophy, concept (as the philosophical tool) and the difference between philosophy and psychology. To me, definitions are fundamental to understand and elaborate.

You can check my post here Misconceptions on philosophy I

Moving to more fun parts of the misconceptions, a distinction must be made with politics. The latter is responsible for creating some damages in the name of philosophy by imposing ideologies.


Ideology is a body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group with reference to some political and social plan, as that of fascism, along with the devices for putting it into operation.  Ideology is always to be linked with politics in both large and strict sense, to religion and to society. It shapes up citizens political behaviour and way of thinking, alongside an economic plan to back it up.

An ideology is not solely the specialty of totalitarian States. Globalization for example is an ideology without being a totalitarian regime, although it has some facets of it as in forming the way of being and thinking.

The tricky part is that some ideologies, in there headlines and big titles, were in a way inspired by philosophy but with major twists. Here is the typical example of the perversion made to philosophy by politics.

Marxism, communism and Leninism:

Karl Marx had earned a bad reputation mainly because of Lenin. Let’s start by saying that Marx’ ultimate goal is the disappearance of the State, replaced by the communist society based on equality among people. He wanted this because he pointed out the exploitation of workers by the state through capitalism. So he aimed for a more liberal form of capitalism.

Lenin, who read Marx very well, did all the opposite. He implemented a gigantic State, the USSR, with a guided economy. Apart from the apparatchik or the members of the Soviet State apparatus, the rest of the people lived equally on less than average compared to the West.

Forever the name of Marx will be linked to the poorly applied communism which was spread on half of the planet. It must be noted that Marxism as in Marx’ works was never applied. The Marxist world is a utopia.

This is one example among many others were ideology and philosophy get confused. Same goes for Nazism and Nietzsche, Consumerism and the concept of freedom, the Cartesian definition of a man and nature’s exploitation and the list goes on.

4 thoughts on “Misconceptions on philosophy II”

  1. I had to look this post of mine up, because it was a while (over a year) when I wrote it…


    The utopia can only be the retreat. A retreat is only a brief few seconds of sleep. A war will rage on, while the eyes are closed to its lights and sounds.

    To make a nation a utopia, would make the human eventually want for a place to retreat, to rest, to escape. It would make the soldier want for a place to retreat. The life is the war. The peace is the retreat. The soldier and his retreat is to be away from the open warfare, and within the closed motherly arms of comfort.

    Where, as we should ask, does one retreat to, in a time of strife, when the utopia collapses, as it is surely bound to? Where is there to run? Where, if everywhere is deemed to be peaceful? The answer is “everywhere and nowhere”.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. A utopia is defined as “bliss”.

    If that is the case, and if we are asleep when we are in such a utopia, then we are blind, surrounded by darkness and decay, though at rest. Are we dead, or are we alive? Do we still fight, or have we been slain?

    I’d say that to live, is to war. Then, to be dead, is to have met peace, have met rest.

    If everywhere around us, within such a utopia paradise, is peaceful, then we have merely blurred the lines between war and peace. What is a war won, if not something like the depression fought against by the PTSD patient, and someday pushed back?

    From cancer, to depression, to a failed math exam, failure has us learn lessons, so that we may one day win that war. Then, we die, once we have truly accepted defeat.

    Victor Hugo said, “An intelligent Hell would be better than a stupid paradise.” I agree with him. If war is Hell, then I would gladly live in it, if only to grow in intelligence. It is called life, is it not?

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s